Blog Jay Leiderman Law

THE DEFENSE MOVES TO EXCLUDE ALL TRIAL WITNESSES FROM THE COURTROOM AND ADMONISH SAID WITNESSES NOT TO DISCUSS THE CASE AMONG THEMSELVES (PENAL CODE SECTION 867, EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 777) [EXCLUDE WITNESSES]

            Evidence Code section 777 entitled “Exclusion of Witness” provides in pertinent part that “[the] court may exclude from the courtroom any witness not at the time under examination so that such witness cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses.” (Italics added.) The purpose of the order is to prevent tailored testimony and aid in the detection of less than candid testimony. (Geders v. United States (1976) 425 U.S. 80, 87 [47 L.Ed.2d 592, 598‑599, 96 S.Ct. 1330]; People v. Valdez (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 680, 687.)

**********************************************************************

At Jay Leiderman Law, we have proven results over years of practice, and we are uniquely qualified to represent you in your time of need. We are situated in Ventura, California but we handle cases throughout the state. We have the expertise, experience and skill to handle numerous types of legal matters.  Jay Leiderman is one of only a few CERTIFIED CRIMINAL LAW SPECIALISTS in the area.  He handles every kind of criminal law case. He is famous for defending medical marijuana cases and computer hacking cases, though the bulk of his practice is a generous mix of those cases plus serious felonies and misdemeanors.  Read more at his Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Leiderman or his homepage www.jayleiderman.com

“A creative and multi-faceted vigorous defense comes from a creative, multifaceted lawyer.” – Jay Leiderman.

jury trial exclude witnesses trial jury evidence

JAY LEIDERMAN, AFTER FREEING A CLIENT FROM JAIL AFTER 83 DAYS. THE CLIENT WAS LOOKING AT 72 YEARS PLUS 5 LIFE SENTENCES ON TOP OF THAT. 10 MONTHS LATER JAY GOT THE CLIENT DECLARED FACTUALLY INNOCENT.

This post does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not constitute legal advice.  Moreover, the law changes over time.  Always consult an attorney before determining what motion s to file and what the current law is as to any particular topic.

Criminal defense attorney and author Jay Leiderman, a California State Bar Certified Criminal Law Specialist can be contacted through the contact page of this website: http://www.jayleiderman.com/htm/contact.php

twitter Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail

Jay Leiderman Jay Leiderman Law
Fighting the Man for You

Criminal Defense Attorney Jay Leiderman

When searching for the right attorney, it is often the worst time in your life. Finding a good one, and the right one for you, is a daunting task. At Jay Leiderman Law, we have proven results over years of practice, and we are uniquely qualified to represent you in your time of need. Jay Leiderman Law believes that they are the right firm for you for many, many reasons.

The Law Offices of Jay Leiderman looks forward to assisting you in your time of need. We offer FREE consultations to all prospective clients.

Address & Contact Information

Jay Leiderman Law
770 County Square Drive Suite 101
Ventura, California 93003

Tel: (805) 654-0200
Fax: (805) 654-0280


Go Back
 

3 Comments

  • Ron Brynaret is nuts says:

    holy shit, for three years Ron Brynaert, mentally ill as all fucking get out, is still obsessing on you! Check his latest rants

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 24
    What kind of a fool would hire a lawyer who tweets links to a video about himself announcing “and he loves whiskey”?

    THis one just shows how batshit crazy he is

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 23
    1) Few months ago, I contacted Yahoo by phone because I had problems logging into my email account. I was told Russians hacked me @wikileaks

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 22
    Who is the liar that gave this bogus info to James McGibney? Was it Jay Leiderman? “Prie5t”? Neal Rauhauser?

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 21
    You’re a sucker if you think Rauhauser cares about Barrett Brown. Neal exploited arrest to help Jay Leiderman client http://twitpic.com/e0u0d0

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 21
    How did Neal Rauhauser know if his name came up in Barrett Brown’s competency hearing? Did Jay Leiderman tell him? http://twitpic.com/e0okyu

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 21
    Jay Leiderman will never answer this question: “Did you approve of Neal Rauhauser exploiting Barrett Brown’s arrest to aid your lawsuit?”

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    3 years ago, Leiderman was far more popular. Now Jay has to beg to get his tweets liked. Most realize he cares mostly about self-promotion.

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    More likely Jay Leiderman trolled all the trolls. He pissed them off with stupidity, then got them to write a judge. @ThaCyc0 @notoriousJD3

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    But what makes even less sense is Jay Leiderman’s insane motions in nearly all his cases which, apparently, sycophantic journos never read.

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    It also made zero sense Leiderman would cry to law enforcement agencies that JoJo made DOS threat, when Jay supports DOSing. @notoriousJD3

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    Jay Leiderman tried asking for money to fight fictional Jojo Camp lawsuit to help pay for Matthew Keys defense, until I bashed him over it.

    Ron Brynaert ‏@ronbryn Aug 15
    Ron Brynaert Retweeted
    I’m not alone in thinking Neal Rauhauser, Jay Leiderman & JoJo Camp may have teamed up. I’m the tie-breaking vote. https://twitter.com/ronbryn/status/764531675183190018

    • Holy shit, I can’t believe that guy is still obsessed with me after all these years. It’s been 5 years that he’s harping on the same nonsense conspiracy stories. He’s batshit crazy.

      It’s weird when you are someone’s whole world but you don’t know they exist until someone points it out to you.

  • Justice Robert H. Jackson says:

    War

    “Particularly when the war power is invoked to do things to the liberties of
    people, or to their property or economy that only indirectly affect conduct of
    the war and do not relate to the engagement of the war itself, the
    constitutional basis should be scrutinized with care. … I would not be
    willing to hold that war powers may be indefinitely prolonged merely by keeping
    legally alive a state of war that had in fact ended. I cannot accept the
    argument that war powers last as long as the effects and consequences of war
    for if so they are permanent — as permanent as the war debts.”
    — Justice Robert H. Jackson

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*